Rep.n Howard “Buck” McKeon (R-Calif.) says that the new missile strategy detailed by Barack Obama Thursday “undercuts” allies and “caves in” to Russia. (0:47)
By Celia Canon- Talk Radio News Service.
Analysts for the Brookings Institution gathered to assess the North Korean threat on America and its allies in reaction to N.Korea’s recent underground nuclear bomb detonation and the launch of two short-range missiles.
The think tank was pressed into discussing the matter following North-Korea’s acceleration in its military activity.
Pyongyang had already caught the international community’s attention in October 2007 by unsuccessfully testing a nuclear weapon.
However the threat posed by the North Asian state has reached new heights after N.Korea announced that it had conducted underground nuclear tests on Monday, followed by two short-range missiles (a ground-to-ship missile and a ground-to-air missile) launched from an east-coast base on Tuesday.
Michael O’Hanlon, a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution warned that although “Their options are limited,” threats must be taken seriously, they must be mitigated.
Richard Bush, a Senior Fellow and Director for the Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies, confirmed that “They have a problem though, and that is that deterrence is not yet credible; their missiles don’t fly far enough and accurately enough, the weapons design is not yet perfect and so they need to test, that’s the only way they can demonstrate to others that they have the capability to inflict harm on the United States and on Japan.”
If the production of the missiles is one leap closer to achieving significant nuclear capabilities, O’Hanlon explained that “The real issue is the size of the weapon and how deliverable it would be by the North Koreans, if they were to choose to deliver it some day.”
Additionally, “[The missile] has to survive the stresses of missile flight, which are no trivial,” said O’Hanlon.
However, according to the analysts, this does not mean that a threat is nonexistent but rather that the U.S should not be concerned by missiles coming from North Korea directly.
O’Hanlon said “I would say the most worrisome question is the sale of nuclear material because if they attack South Korea, their regime will end.”
O’Hanlon concluded that “The only thing they can plausibly get way with is the sale.”
By Celia Canon- Talk Radio News Service
The U.S is not doing enough to counter the terrorist threat that Iran and North Korea raise, according to Republican Congressman Trent Franks (Ariz.).
“The jihadist mindset would like to see a nuclear blast in the U.S.,” Franks said today at the Capitol Hill Club. “They have irrational goals.”
The Department of Defense recently released its Fiscal Year 2010 budget, which amounts to “a proposed defense budget of $663.8 billion,” according to the DoD. Franks fears that the numbers reflect a lack of attention not being paid to countries considered threatening to U.S. national security.
In April, North-Korea launched a ballistic missile-bearing satellite. It is widely believed that the launch was an attempt by the country to test its weapons capabilities.
Franks said,“If North-Korea is willing to sell missile technology, then they might be selling war heads.”
Although Iran has been less aggressive in its rhetoric in the past months, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has had strong words in the past, in particular towards Israel. He is thought to have said that “Israel must be wiped off the map.”
Iran is another country that needs to be watched, Franks said. “The last thing we want is Iran coming up with a nuclear technology that they can surrogate for terrorist groups,” he said. “It is very likely that they (Iranians) will put it in the hands of nuclear terrorists.”
By Michael Ruhl, University of New Mexico – Talk Radio News Service
Israeli President Shimon Peres spoke today in favor of peace in the Middle East, but some in the audience likely couldn’t hear his call, as protesters within the room shouted him down. Three eruptions of protesters in the audience were stopped by police. The protesters shouted from tabletops and waved signs saying “stop the occupation” and “free gaza.” This all transpired at the Washington DC Convention Center, at a conference led by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
Peres spoke of his commitment to the peace process, saying that one of the big challenges they all faced was to “disconnect religion from terror”, so extremists are not killing in the name of a higher power.
“History is on the side of peace… history’s on our side,” Peres said. He continued that the extremists leading Iran “are on the wrong side of history.” Peres acknowledged that most Iranians are good people whom he respects, but pointed his finger at extremists like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as being the problem.
“Iran is not threatened by anybody,” Peres said, and continued that Iran’s new missile programs are unnecessary. He said that Iran’s missile development and nuclear program are a threat to Israel “and the global community at large.”
Peres said that he trusts President Obama to make meaningful bilateral negotiations, and to contribute significantly to the peace process.
From the beginning, we have been a team, and our mission is to get rid of all the militias and all insurgents in Iraq, Major General Ali Salih Farhood Oothman, Commander of the 8th Iraqi Army Division, said through an interpreter during a live-via-satellite Pentagon press briefing from Camp Victory in Baghdad. Oothman, head of a division that covers 24% of Iraq consisting of five Iraqi provinces including the Iranian border and Saudi Arabian border, said that his responsibilities in the area are complex because of al-Qaida. However, al-Qaida is not his greatest threat.
The greatest threat according to Oothman is the special militias. In his area of operation, he has both al-Qaida and special militias. In the capital cities of the provinces, he says, there are the militias. The reason for the higher threat level, is that the special groups are trained and equipped by the Iranians. Those groups don’t face you, he said, they use IEDs (improvised explosive devices), or they “stab us in the back” with their politicians. Because the militias are not able to face the Iraqi Army directly, they go to Iran, where they are trained, equipped, and then sent back in to assassinate leaders.
Present as well was Army Major General Michael Oates, Commander of the Multi-National Division Center and the 10th Mountain Division. He agreed with Oothman’s assessment of the Iraq Army’s capabilities, stating that the Army, although much improved and better off than in 2006, demonstrates that there is a need to raise the comparable level of operations that they are responsible for. Four things, Oates said, are needed: we need to work on improving their [Iraqi Army] forces, civics courses need to be given to learn how to assess Iraq’s civilian needs, we need to go after AQI (al-Qaida in Iraq), and we need to reduce the Iranian influence within Iraq.
The topic brought up most frequently during the brief was the inadequate training and supplies. Oates pointed out that the Iraqi Army has been fighting “right out of the box” since the beginning, and was never able to be properly trained. Watching their [Iraqi] army operate, Oates said, he sees that they are very capable and they are seeking initiative in performing their own operations, but we [United States] still are providing valuable assistance. The Iraqi Army is “coming along” but they are not sophisticated with reconnaissance and surveillance. Professionalism is what is missing; the army went into combat with no training, they’ve been in constant combat since 2003, and it’s been tough for them to learn logistics.
Oothman said that since the beginning, they had to work to train their officers. They conducted several training services for their officers, and they send medics to learn some training and they are more professional than they used to be. But to be independent in this battle, Oothman said, we have to not only learn administrative and logistical duties, but we need something else: medical facilities and garages to maintain our vehicles. 80% of these needs are met by coalition forces, and there is currently no plan to build a hospital or a garage.
The Iraqi Army is showing initiative, Oates said, I’m proud to serve with them and I’m here to provide whatever assistance I can. They are making huge strides. We [the United States] should be proud of our soldiers, and they are performing magnificently.
The House Armed Services Committee Strategic Forces Subcommittee held a hearing to examine the fiscal year 2009 National Defense Authorization Budget Request of Missile Defense Programs.
Witnesses from high ranking Defense positions fielded questions about the budget request, including Air Force Lt. Gen. Henry Obering, director of the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). Obering talked about how the budget ensures America will not only continue to have strong short term military capabilities, but will protect us in the “long term as well.”
Obering said the budget request by President Bush for missile defense programs is “extremely modest” in comparison to what it does for our country. Obering mentioned that he hopes the military’s success in doing things with missiles like shooting down satellites continue while still being “operationally affordable” in coming years.
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for East Asia, David Sedney says that the Chinese military continues to develop anti-satellite technology and other space capailities during a press briefing on the annual Chinese Military Power Report at the Pentagon. (0:32)
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for East Asia, David Sedney speaks about new missiles being developed by China and how most of these missiles are being aimed at Taiwan. (0:57)
Today the Department of Defense released its annual assessment of Chinese military power. The U.S. Congress as well as the President have been briefed on the report which outlines technical and political changes in the overall Chinese military capabilities. The report concludes that the People’s Liberation Army is moving away from a massive force size aimed at gaining the upper hand in wars of attrition to a strategy of short-term, high tech engagements particularly at sea, on Chinese borders and in disputed territories.
One discovery in this year’s assessment is that the Chinese have been stepping up weapons development in order to fight in “informataized” situations or a circumstance where operations are inhibited by communications jamming, electronic surveillance and precision weapons. The report also found that the Chinese are developing capabilities to deal with joint operations or the ability to engage multiple force (air force, naval, etc) offensives.
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for East Asia, David Sedney held a briefing for Pentagon reporters on the report. He said that the Chinese government has always protested the report and he expects that they will protest this year’s report as mischaracterizing Chinese intentions. But he said that the most difficult part of creating the report was to assess Chinese intention, because there is such a lack of transparency when it comes to investigating Chinese military assets.
He highlighted the realm of cyber military initiatives citing the report which said that cyber “intrusions’ of U.S. computer systems where sensitive, and possibly proprietary business information may have been breached through invasion could be linked to the People’s Liberation Army. He said that this is the newest challenge when it comes to responding to Chinese military tactics.
The military report affirmed that China has “the most active ballistic missile program in the world.” One of the missiles being developed is an anti-ship missile, fired from land and designed to intercept a ship, even one as large as an aircraft carrier at medium to long-range distances. The controversial 2007 launch of an anti-satellite missile was mentioned in the report as evidence of China’s space and couterspace military technology.
The report does note an uptick in Taiwan’s spending to 3 percent of GDP in 2008. The increase is also directed at increasing missile technology The report said that the United States remains helpful in providing information to Taiwan to continue developing self defense technology.
