The Center for Strategic and International Studies’ James Lewis says Hezbollah uses “cool” technology that, while not the most advanced, can be part of “any war.”

:20

 

 Standard Podcast [0:20m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

By Michael Combier-Talk Radio News Service

Middle East Institute Scholar Graeme Bannerman says that the Shia community in Lebanon considers Hezbollah as their mentor and their leader. (0:27)

 

 Standard Podcast [0:27m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

By Michael Combier-Talk Radio News Service

Middle East Institute Scholar Graeme Bannerman says that 95 percent of the Shia voting population has voted for Hezbollah in the recent Parliamentary election in Lebanon and that for this reason the organization cannot be pushed aside from the political arena. (0:15)

 

 Standard Podcast [0:15m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

By Michael Combier-Talk Radio News Service

The results of the Lebanon Parliamentary election on June 7th represent a step forward for the country, but sectarian division still exists and may de-stabilize the nation in the future said Middle East experts who gathered at a forum today at the United States Institute of Peace in Washington D.C.

“The fact that the election went smoothly gives us hope…It could potentially put Lebanon on a positive trajectory toward greater reform and reconciliation,” said Mona Yacoubian, a special advisor to the Institute’s Muslim World Initiative.

The opposition, including the Maronite leader Michel Aoun and Hezbollah, did not pick up any seats in Parliament. Middle East Institute Scholar Graeme Bannerman attributed this to the fact that the country’s Sunni population voted mainly in support of Lebanon’s pro-Western bloc, known as the ‘“March 14th Coalition.” Bannerman added that “General Aoun’s people lost support within the Christian community.”

Despite the results, Hezbollah still remains a strong influence in the country, and the next government will have to find a way to work with the anti-Western organization said most of the panel’s participants.

“The Hezbollah is positioning itself for a kind of a deal” that will involve a political status quo on the organization’s militarization said Randa Slim, a scholar at the USIP.

Because of the Hezbollah’s control in local districts of Lebanon, the government, led by the ‘March 14 Coalition,’ “will be less likely to call in the immediate term for Hezbollah’s disarmament,” added Slim.

Lebanon’s Interior Minister will soon release the county-by-county election results.

Bilal Saab, a Lebanon expert at the Brookings Institution, explains that the Lebanese president is faced with a ‘balancing act’ as he should try to satisfy two opposing groups. Indeed, the radical Hezbollah party does not trust the President for his Western inclinations whilst the March 14th coalition of anti-Syrians believes the President is too lenient with the Syrians. As a result, the President might not be granted additional powers. (0:41)

 

 Standard Podcast [0:41m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

During the last decade, the U.S.-Iran relationship has been a great disappointment to the Iranians, according to Geneive Abdo, former Guardian correspondent in Iran and a current Fellow member of The Century Foundation, which hosted a panelist discussion on the “Escalating Pressures on Iran”. “For 30 years U.S. administrations have sanctioned Iran, isolated Iran, condemned Iran…,” said Abdo.

The panel focused on issues on how to develop a better approach involving issues with Iran, which includes nuclear programs and Iranian regime shifting. According to Abdo, Hezbollah’s and Hamas’s influence are growing stronger in the Middle-East region, which indicate that United States policies are failing in that area, a reason for the United States to change how to “talk” with Iran. Abdo highlighted that U.S. will be unable to achieve its objectives in Iraq and Afghanistan without co-operation from Iran.

Samuel Gardiner, retired U.S. Air Force Colonel and author of the book Dangerous and Getting more Dangerous: The Delicate Situation between the United States and Iran, stated that Iran most likely does not want nuclear powers to aim at the United States nor potential neighboring countries, but simply to protect their own national security interests. “The Iranian regime is not suicidal,” said Gardiner.

The panel agreed that when speaking of nuclear weapons, the United States cannot exclude military action from the agenda. According to Gardiner, unofficially, it seems like U.S. current foreign policy on Iran is centered around overthrowing the Iranian government. “Yes, we can strike the nuclear facilities and yes, we can do serious damage, the problem is that we will have to deal with the response,” Gardiner said. “How do we deal with the response?”.

Gardiner said that those who pose a threat, when speaking on how to approach the Iran issue is not President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad anymore, but the supreme leaders and spiritual leaders in Iran.

According to Hillary Mann Leverett, (CEO of Stratega (Strategic Energy and Global Analysis) and former Director of Iran and Persian Gulf Affairs National Security Council, both sides need to compromise if they are to succeed in developing a comprehensive approach to their policies. Leverett highlighted that reserving Iran’s security interests is an important point for them to be able to succeed with a relationship involving the United States. She also noted that it is going to be difficult, for the United States to take regime change off the table.

U.S. should not preemptively attack Iran

At the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a discussion was held on the implications of relations between the United States and Iran. Zbigniew Brzezinski, former national security advisor to President Jimmy Carter, said that Iran must make a concession before the U.S. will negotiate them, the hostility of the region and the “clumsiness” that the problem has been handled has been a problem.

The U.S. has lived with a nuclear armed Russia, China, Pakistan, India and Israel for many years, deterrence will work with Iran as well, but preemptive war will not work, Brzezinski said. Iran is looking to build up its nuclear program to be secure in the region, but it is incorrect to say that they will use nuclear weapons to attack Israel or give them to Hezbollah, he said. The Iranian government is not very popular among the Iranian people and they will not support military action against other nations, they are only building up nuclear weapons to ensure security and safety in a volatile region, Brzezinski said.

The U.S. needs to be willing to lower sanctions on Iran, if the Iranian government promises not to use their uranium for nuclear weapons, Brzezinski said. However, the U.S. should not back down on nuclear proliferation and thereby unintentionally legitimizing the use of force to gain respect and power in the Middle East, he said.

At the Iran’s Nuclear Aspirations hearing, Congressman Mike Pence (R-Ind.) says Iran is more than just a ‘pest’. He refers to it as the most malevolent country in the world and he commemorates the 25th anniversary of the Hezbollah bombings of marine corps barracks in Beirut. (0:49)

 

 Standard Podcast [0:49m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

The American Enterprise Institute hosted a panel on Lebanon highlighting many of the issues affecting the country. The panel consisted of Danielle Pletka and Michael Rubin of AEI, Robert Malley of the International Crisis Group, Lee Smith of the Hudson Institute, and Hassan Mneimneh, Iraq Memory Foundation.
(more…)

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

MS. PERINO: Hi. The President had his normal briefings at 8:00 a.m. At 11:35 a.m. he will interview with Mike Allen for a Yahoo.com news interview in the Roosevelt Room. And then at 5:30 p.m. he and Mrs. Bush depart the White House on their way to the Middle East. We’ll go to Jerusalem tonight.
(more…)