Pelosi: Reducing Health Care Surcharge For Wealthy A Possibility
The 1-5.4% surcharge proposed by Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) for those making over $280,000 to help cover the costs of health care reform could be reduced, said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) during a press conference Wednesday.
The current version of health care reform that passed through the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Tuesday is expected to draw half of it’s funding from revenue streams, notably the proposed surcharge, and the rest from surplus funds taken from other programs, such as $500 billion in savings from the Medicare program.
“I believe that all the costs of the health reform bill can come from squeezing more savings out of the system,” the Speaker said.
If successful in acquiring enough savings, Pelosi noted that reducing the surcharge was one possibility. Another would be maintaining the surcharge at the current cost and reallocating it towards paying off the U.S. deficit.
One Response to “Pelosi: Reducing Health Care Surcharge For Wealthy A Possibility”
Categories
Related
- Pelosi: Congress Must Prioritize Or Risk Uncontainable Health Care Bill
- White House Will Try To Recoup Cost Of Health Reform Says Orszag
- Pelosi: Entitlement Reform Essential To Reducing The Deficit
- Speaker Pelosi addresses gas prices, veterans
- Pelosi: Public Will See Through Insurance Industry’s Misinformation
Latest Audio
Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter
- @jackrice: On MSNBC tomorrow morning to talk about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Personally, I'm thrilled they decided to try him in NYC. The perfect place! -- 8 hours ago
- @jackrice: Great time tonight on @MSNBC with @edschultz. Always enjoy myself. -- 11 hours ago
- @gaholtzman: Good news everyone, the US LABOR Secretary pushed years ago for allowing illegal imms to attend public universities http://bit.ly/5Y2gfN .. -- 13 hours ago
- @jackrice: LISTEN: Jihadis Come Back From The Brink http://ff.im/-bLZRD -- 14 hours ago
- @jackrice: Government Must Ration Health Care (AUDIO) http://ff.im/-bLZRJ -- 14 hours ago
- @jackrice: LISTEN: Future Senators? Dobbs v Rudy http://ff.im/-bLZRB -- 14 hours ago
- @Laura8524: Labor Secretary gave advice for latinos across the country -- 16 hours ago
- @jackrice: I Appear on MSNBC Tomorrow Morning. http://ff.im/-bLEgY -- 16 hours ago
- @jackrice: I'm on MSNBC Tonight at 6. http://ff.im/-bLDow -- 16 hours ago
- @Laura8524: Senator Bob Menendez signs book, Growing American Roots, at the Capital Hilton -- 17 hours ago





July 20th, 2009 at 4:05 am
Basically, If ruling party changes, accordingly tax system also does, especially given the condition that the middle class is undergoing severe financial hardship as a consequence of the extremely high fuel price, mortgage rate, and insurance premium, which is a beauty and virtue of democracy as we know.
In case some people have enjoyed the benefit of exemptions, that might imply others have shouldered the equivalent of their share.
Now the time has come for the middle class and middle class-oriented party to take initiative.
In general, advanced states are characterized as a broad base of middle class, the recovery of which is what the last presidential election is for, too.
Alongside a tax on the richest, alcohol tax and ‘ending subsidies for the private insurers’ can be considered, I guess.