GOP Wants U.S. to Be a Leader in the “Nuclear Renaissance”

Posted by Staff on June 9, 2009 |

Members of the Senate Republican Conference have adopted the challenge of creating 100 new nuclear plants in the United States in the next 20 years. The main objective of the proposal is to produce more American energy while using less.

“If climate change is the inconvenient problem of the day, then nuclear power is the inconvenient answer,” said U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Senate Republican Conference Chairman.

Alexander said it is “hard to imagine” why the most urgent solution would not be how to produce more nuclear energy in the next 20 years. He said without nuclear power, the U.S. would not have a chance of a clean air economy.

David Blee, executive director of the U.S. Transport Council, discussed the building process of the 100 new nuclear plants. There is currently only one nuclear energy plant under construction in the United States, TVA’s Watts Bar unit 2.

Blee said that nuclear energy is the “most potent clean energy baseload power option, the most powerful stimulator of jobs per megawatt and enjoys record performance reliability, safety, economics and strong public support.”

However, nuclear energy was removed from the stimulus package and there is not a nuclear title in the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s recently passed clean energy bill.

“To me this is almost a P.R. situation. I don’t think Americans are aware of the potential associated with nuclear power.” said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).

June 9, 2009

One Response to “GOP Wants U.S. to Be a Leader in the “Nuclear Renaissance””

  1. Crew Jones Says:

    The GOP should read the Cato Institute’s Jerry Taylor, who as a conservative makes an excellent case for NOT building more nuclear plants. The industry lives off federal subsidies, is not able to survive on its own in the free market, and provides a better example for not perpetuating welfare than any “welfare queen.” That the GOP would promote such business sloth begs the question – why? I can only surmise that it wants to show off some kind of macho credentials by backing what is really only a complex way to boil water. If you have to back a loser-in-the-marketplace industry to show how tough you are, you’ve already lost the battle.


Latest Audio

  • Labor Secretary Recalls Helping Undocumented Students Go To College
  • GOP Leaders Look To Suade Moderate Democrats On Health Care Vote
  • Democrats’ Health Bill One Great Big Ponzi Scheme, Says Thune
  • Senate Democrats Employ ‘Gimmickry’ To Keep Health Bill Below $900 Billion

Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter