Boehner Accuses Pelosi Of Killing Jobs And Creating More CO2 Through Waxman-Markey Support
By Sam Wechsler-Talk Radio News Service
House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) voiced strong opposition Thursday to Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) support of the American Clean Energy and Security Act, also known as the Waxman-Markey bill.
Boehner began a press conference Thursday asking, “Where are the jobs?”, complaining that three million jobs have already been lost this year and that new jobs are not coming from government spending but from small businesses. He then stated that the upcoming Waxman-Markey bill would force small businesses to pay more for high energy and cost 2.3 to 2.7 million Americans their jobs.
“Mark my words, the American people are going to remember this vote. This will be a defining moment and a defining vote in this Congress,” said Boehner.
The Minority Leader argued that the bill will not cause carbon dioxide emissions to decrease, but will instead result in an increase. Once the high energy sector jobs have been shipped overseas, the energy companies in India and China will import more American coal, Boehner explained. He added that since China and India do not have the technology America does, when the country burns the coal to produce energy they will create five times more carbon dioxide emissions than if the coal was burned in the U.S.
“[Waxman-Markey] is the most convoluted idea I’ve ever seen,” Boehner said.
3 Responses to “Boehner Accuses Pelosi Of Killing Jobs And Creating More CO2 Through Waxman-Markey Support”
Categories
Related
Latest Audio
Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter
- @jackrice: On MSNBC tomorrow morning to talk about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Personally, I'm thrilled they decided to try him in NYC. The perfect place! -- 6 hours ago
- @jackrice: Great time tonight on @MSNBC with @edschultz. Always enjoy myself. -- 8 hours ago
- @gaholtzman: Good news everyone, the US LABOR Secretary pushed years ago for allowing illegal imms to attend public universities http://bit.ly/5Y2gfN .. -- 10 hours ago
- @jackrice: LISTEN: Jihadis Come Back From The Brink http://ff.im/-bLZRD -- 11 hours ago
- @jackrice: Government Must Ration Health Care (AUDIO) http://ff.im/-bLZRJ -- 11 hours ago
- @jackrice: LISTEN: Future Senators? Dobbs v Rudy http://ff.im/-bLZRB -- 11 hours ago
- @Laura8524: Labor Secretary gave advice for latinos across the country -- 13 hours ago
- @jackrice: I Appear on MSNBC Tomorrow Morning. http://ff.im/-bLEgY -- 14 hours ago
- @jackrice: I'm on MSNBC Tonight at 6. http://ff.im/-bLDow -- 14 hours ago
- @Laura8524: Senator Bob Menendez signs book, Growing American Roots, at the Capital Hilton -- 15 hours ago
June 25th, 2009 at 5:27 pm
And at another point later in the press conference, Mr. Boehner claimed that we will end up shipping our coal to be burned in China. And then he made the surprising assertion that the same coal burned in China would produce FIVE TIMES as much CO2 as if that coal were burned in the U.S.
This might be called the “New Republican Chemistry”…
June 25th, 2009 at 5:29 pm
Oops — I should have read to the end of the post above!
Still the chemistry is interesting…
July 9th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
I am with John Boehner…
Life can be simple…and life can be hard!
Today’s all-encompassing Cap and Trade (emission trading) suggestions, give unpredictability, expense, and needless disruption from normal business practice on one hand, or unnecessary profiteering from free allowance handouts with little actual emission reduction on the other hand – together with extensive -and unnecessary- regulation on what people can or can’t buy and use.
Understanding why proposed Cap and Trade is bad, in USA and elsewhere
http://www.ceolas.net/#cce5x
Basic Idea — Offsets — Tree Planting — Manufacture Shift — Fair Trade — Surreal Market — Real Market — Allowances: Auctions + Hand-Outs — Allowance Trading — Companies: Business Stability + Business Cost — In Conclusion
Instead…..
Sufficient first phase 2020/2030 emission reduction is achieved by acting on ELECTRICITY generation (coal, gas) and TRANSPORT (mainly automobiles) alone, since these 2 sectors typically (as in the USA) account for 80% of greenhouse gas emissions.
The focus on electricity and transport gives several advantages – apart from lowering CO2 emissions:
1. Local environmental benefit from less pollution of sulphur and all else that’s in the emissions, regardless of the less certain or immediate global benefit from CO2 reduction.
2. Electricity supply alternatives which together with improved grid distribution gives better competition and keeps down electricity bills for consumers.
3. Transport alternatives (using electricity, hydrogen and other energy sources), which give variety of choice and competition advantages for consumers, additionally reducing the dependency on oil imports.
4. No trade problems: Unlike Cap and Trade, which involves cement, steel and other industries having to face imports from unregulated countries, the here suggested electricity and transport changes are not just more limited, but also largely local. Since there is little competition between say utility companies internationally, “best practice” results can be compared and shared.
Funding and Impact
Equity and long term loan finance can be used: Long term industrial loans from financial institutions, particularly if federal/state guaranteed, give low yearly interest repayments and lessen the effect on electricity bills or transport cost.
The Way Forward
http://www.ceolas.net/#cc10x
Introduction — Funding and Impact —No Energy Efficiency Regulation — A New Electric World
Electricity Generation — Distribution
Transport Power Generation — Regulation — Taxation
.