<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP: No Third Party For Health Care Decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkradionews.com/2009/05/gop-no-third-party-for-health-care-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkradionews.com/2009/05/gop-no-third-party-for-health-care-decisions/</link>
	<description>The Talk Radio News Service is the only information news service dedicated to serving the talk radio community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:19:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hagan</title>
		<link>http://talkradionews.com/2009/05/gop-no-third-party-for-health-care-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-44291</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkradionews.com/?p=26588#comment-44291</guid>
		<description>It is galling to hear mendacious blather about  &quot;choice [of plan] for individuals&quot; and &quot;We want to make sure that health care decisions remain between a patient and a physician, not a bureaucrat.&quot; I asked a friend working for a large employer how much choice of plan he has.  Answer: none. Who decides what treatments he is allowed? An insurance company bureaucrat, one of the army of denial clerks the healthcos employ to limit costs, which they call &quot;medical losses&quot;, i.e., payment for health care services.

The real mystery is that &quot;health care insurance as we know it&quot; continues to entail huge markups. Even with all the pressure to keep healthcare costs down, health insurance companies persist in imposing a 50% markup on the healthcare delivery services they choose to pay for. Why do they do this, when supermarkets can flourish with a 2% markup?  

They are not all run by a bunch of greedy incompetents: there must be something about &quot;free market&quot; health insurance that requires a large markup. Something inherent must impose large expenses compared to the Medicare single-payer solution, which functions with a markup of about 5%. Hence the inordinate fear of any kind of government competition. FedEx and UPS thrive despite competition from the Post Office; why can&#039;t the healthcos handle government competition? Why, exactly, do they need to mark up health care services by 50%?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is galling to hear mendacious blather about  &#8220;choice [of plan] for individuals&#8221; and &#8220;We want to make sure that health care decisions remain between a patient and a physician, not a bureaucrat.&#8221; I asked a friend working for a large employer how much choice of plan he has.  Answer: none. Who decides what treatments he is allowed? An insurance company bureaucrat, one of the army of denial clerks the healthcos employ to limit costs, which they call &#8220;medical losses&#8221;, i.e., payment for health care services.</p>
<p>The real mystery is that &#8220;health care insurance as we know it&#8221; continues to entail huge markups. Even with all the pressure to keep healthcare costs down, health insurance companies persist in imposing a 50% markup on the healthcare delivery services they choose to pay for. Why do they do this, when supermarkets can flourish with a 2% markup?  </p>
<p>They are not all run by a bunch of greedy incompetents: there must be something about &#8220;free market&#8221; health insurance that requires a large markup. Something inherent must impose large expenses compared to the Medicare single-payer solution, which functions with a markup of about 5%. Hence the inordinate fear of any kind of government competition. FedEx and UPS thrive despite competition from the Post Office; why can&#8217;t the healthcos handle government competition? Why, exactly, do they need to mark up health care services by 50%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://talkradionews.com/2009/05/gop-no-third-party-for-health-care-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-44271</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 13:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkradionews.com/?p=26588#comment-44271</guid>
		<description>I love how Tom Price hides behind his simplistic &quot;free market&quot; ideology.  What a fraud.  He is opposed to any involvement by our government to curb the abuses of the insurance industry.

Actually, he may not be a fruad, it may be that he&#039;s just hopelessly misguided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how Tom Price hides behind his simplistic &#8220;free market&#8221; ideology.  What a fraud.  He is opposed to any involvement by our government to curb the abuses of the insurance industry.</p>
<p>Actually, he may not be a fruad, it may be that he&#8217;s just hopelessly misguided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://talkradionews.com/2009/05/gop-no-third-party-for-health-care-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-44270</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 13:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkradionews.com/?p=26588#comment-44270</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a simple calculation.  The insurance industry and drug companies own most of congress.  Congressmen &amp; President Obama will do what big money wants done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a simple calculation.  The insurance industry and drug companies own most of congress.  Congressmen &amp; President Obama will do what big money wants done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
