Supreme Court upholds fines for “fleeting expletives”
In what is being seen as a set-back for the TV industry, the Supreme Court Tuesday morning tentatively gave the Federal Communications Commission license to regulate the use of curse words during live broadcasts. Opponents of the close 5-4 ruling say the FCC did not adequately explain its policy shift.
The court explicitly refused to discuss freedom of speech concerns about the regulation, saying that discussion would have to come in another case.
The FCC has long regulated obscene and indecent language on broadcast television, but until 2006 it did not take action over so-called “fleeting expletives,” such as using the F-Word and S-Word spontaneously in a non-literal sense.
In 2006 the FCC issued fines for Fox’s broadcast in 2002 of a live appearance by Cher in which she said, “I’ve also had critics for the last 40 years saying that I was on my way out every year. Right. So f*** ‘em.” The FCC also fined a 2003 broadcast in which Nicole Richie said, “Why do they even call it ‘The Simple Life?’ Have you ever tried to get cow s*** out of a Prada purse? It’s not so f***ing simple.”
Fox appealed the fine to the courts, arguing that the FCC had not justified the change in their policy, since in 2004 the FCC allowed a broadcast of Bono using a fleeting expletive to go without fine.
2 Responses to “Supreme Court upholds fines for “fleeting expletives””
Categories
Related
- Today at Talk Radio News Service
- Hatch Asks Finance Committee To Be More “Perspicacious”
- Victoria Jones asks Scott McClellan if ‘rejectionist’ is a replacement word for ‘insurgent’ in Iraq
- Sotomayor Has A Literal Reading of Statutes
- President Bush remarks on comprehensive immigration reform, describing the underground industries that have arisen to smuggle people into the U.S. and create fake documents.
Latest Audio
Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter
- @jackrice: I Embed with the the 82nd Airborne in Afghanistan in Dec. http://ff.im/-bOlF2 -- 2 hours ago
- @bobney: Wow, money for votes, doesn't that get you in trouble? :-) - POLITICO.com - http://shar.es/aiGGE -- 2 hours ago
- @bobney: Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) will vote for cloture to begin the healthcare debate, has reserved her right to vote no on passage -- 2 hours ago
- @tdowlats: RT @huffingtonpost Reporters Uncensored: How to Build a Continent: A Do it Yourself Guide http://bit.ly/48dl6X -- 4 hours ago
- @bobney: Listen to the American Cancer Society vs the Preventive Services Task Force about mammograms-the PSTaskForce has to be out of their minds -- 5 hours ago
- @bobney: Yea, a push for more of our jobs to go to the Commie Chinese Gov't- Obama: Asia trip part of U.S. jobs push - POLITICO http://shar.es/ai5r1 -- 5 hours ago
- @bobney: Hot air lineup, get your boots on ---Sunday talk show tip sheet - Dianna Heitz - POLITICO.com - http://shar.es/ai5pd -- 5 hours ago
- @bobney: OR,Get the Democratic candidate to call the Republican Candidate Fat-GOP eyes McDonnell strategy - Jonathan Martin - http://shar.es/ai5gc -- 5 hours ago
- @bobney: Healthcare part deux!! What to watch for in today's debate - Chris Frates - POLITICO.com - http://shar.es/ai5fK -- 5 hours ago
- @bobney: God Bless Stefanie-Stefanie Spielman Obituary: Stefanie Spielman’s Obituary by the The Columbus Dispatch.: http://bit.ly/8utrv9 via -- 6 hours ago





April 28th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
Are you F**K**G S*I*I*G ME? THOSE DIRTY BASTARDS ARE S**T*NG ON OUR *U*K** RIGHTS
April 28th, 2009 at 3:11 pm
To be clear, this case did not address any First Amendment, free speech claims. That will undoubtedly come in another case.