A Compromise on Gay Marriage
A discussion at the Brookings Institute regarding gay marriage was held with participants David Blankenhorn, President of the Institute for American Values, and Jonathan Rauch, author of the book “Gay Marriage: Why It is Good for Gays, Good for Straights and Good for America.”
Blankenhorn and Rauch presented their proposal of legalizing gay marriage. The proposal works as a compromise between the advocates of gay marriage and the religious groups that oppose it.
“Congress would bestow the status of federal civil unions on same-sex marriage and civil unions granted at the state level, thereby conferring upon them most or all of the federal benefits and rights of marriage. But there would be a condition: Washington would recognize only those unions licensed in states with robust religious-conscience exceptions, which provide that religious organizations need not recognize same-sex unions against their will,” Rauch explained.
Blankenhorn further discussed the danger of viewing the different opinions as wrong and using bad faith. He explained that to solve this delicate issue, a compromise is necessary.
Rauch also emphasized the importance of legalizing gay marriage, but leaving the religious groups the possibility to choose for themselves. He referred to this as the compromise, and by enforcing this proposal, civil rights will be protected.
2 Responses to “A Compromise on Gay Marriage”
Categories
Related
- Same-Sex Marriage Advocates Go Before DC Council
- Marriage Equality Moving Forward
- Same-Sex Marriage Advocates Testify Before D.C. Council
- Rabbi Joui Hessel, at a "Clergy for Fairness" press conference against the Federal Marriage Amendment, says that the gay marriage ban will legally limit civil liberties.
- Healthy marriage and domestic violence programs share common ground
Latest Audio
Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter
- @jackrice: Wow. Lot of fun @msnbc. Really fast. Jackrice.org -- 1 hour ago
- @jackrice: Sitting here @msnbc and getting ready to go on the air. Interesting. -- 1 hour ago
- @jackrice: I Appear on MSNBC This Morning at 7:30 a.m. e.t. http://ff.im/-bNyTA -- 2 hours ago
- @jackrice: On MSNBC tomorrow morning to talk about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Personally, I'm thrilled they decided to try him in NYC. The perfect place! -- 11 hours ago
- @jackrice: Great time tonight on @MSNBC with @edschultz. Always enjoy myself. -- 14 hours ago
- @gaholtzman: Good news everyone, the US LABOR Secretary pushed years ago for allowing illegal imms to attend public universities http://bit.ly/5Y2gfN .. -- 16 hours ago
- @jackrice: LISTEN: Jihadis Come Back From The Brink http://ff.im/-bLZRD -- 17 hours ago
- @jackrice: Government Must Ration Health Care (AUDIO) http://ff.im/-bLZRJ -- 17 hours ago
- @jackrice: LISTEN: Future Senators? Dobbs v Rudy http://ff.im/-bLZRB -- 17 hours ago
- @Laura8524: Labor Secretary gave advice for latinos across the country -- 18 hours ago





March 13th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
This “compromise” has no thought put into it. This is exactly what California had in place last year, yet some people couldn’t handle it. Marriage equality for everyone!
March 13th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
Why should we compromise for anything less than equality? We don’t need to accept your lectures, or religious zealotry.
Religion sucks!