Retired Lt. General calls for change in Afghan War
By Michael Ruhl, University of New Mexico – Talk Radio News Service
While testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Retired Lt. General David Barno said that in his opinion the Afghan war at the beginning of 2009 was “drifting towards failure”, and that a change in strategy is necessary. He defined success for the United States in 5 ways. First, the Taliban and Al-Qaeda being defeated in the region and denied usable sanctuary, preventing them from engaging in future attacks on the United States and its allies. Secondly, Pakistan would become a long term ally of the United States, and no longer would serve as a terrorist base. Next, success for NATO is important to the US mission, as is establishing a stable and sustainable Afghan government which is legitimate in the eyes of its people and can govern and control its territory. Finally, the people in this region should be confident in U.S. as a friend in helping them combat extremism. (2:12)
One Response to “Retired Lt. General calls for change in Afghan War”
Categories
Related
- Petraeus: Beating Terrorists Requires More Than Counterterrorist Operations
- Bond “cautiously optimistic” over Obama approach to Pakistan
- President Obama’s remarks on Afghanistan elections
- AEI scholar Frederick Kagan, at briefing on the London Terrorist Attacks, asserts that the terrorists’ ideology of hate will fail to achieve mass recruitment.
- Extremism in Pakistan higher than ever
Latest Audio
Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter
- @jackrice: I Appear on MSNBC This Morning at 7:30 a.m. e.t. http://ff.im/-bNyTA -- 17 minutes ago
- @jackrice: On MSNBC tomorrow morning to talk about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Personally, I'm thrilled they decided to try him in NYC. The perfect place! -- 9 hours ago
- @jackrice: Great time tonight on @MSNBC with @edschultz. Always enjoy myself. -- 12 hours ago
- @gaholtzman: Good news everyone, the US LABOR Secretary pushed years ago for allowing illegal imms to attend public universities http://bit.ly/5Y2gfN .. -- 14 hours ago
- @jackrice: LISTEN: Jihadis Come Back From The Brink http://ff.im/-bLZRD -- 14 hours ago
- @jackrice: Government Must Ration Health Care (AUDIO) http://ff.im/-bLZRJ -- 14 hours ago
- @jackrice: LISTEN: Future Senators? Dobbs v Rudy http://ff.im/-bLZRB -- 14 hours ago
- @Laura8524: Labor Secretary gave advice for latinos across the country -- 16 hours ago
- @jackrice: I Appear on MSNBC Tomorrow Morning. http://ff.im/-bLEgY -- 17 hours ago
- @jackrice: I'm on MSNBC Tonight at 6. http://ff.im/-bLDow -- 17 hours ago






February 26th, 2009 at 1:02 pm
Apparently, DC and its denizens only “belong” to the United States in the sense of chattel property, “in all cases whatosever”; not in the sense of being full and equal citizens. “If this be not slavery, then is there no such thing as slavery upon the earth. Even the expression is impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God.”
Google this last quote; and for context, compare the District Clause and the Declaratory Act of 1766…two national legislatures unwarrantedly arrogating to themselves Absolute Power over an unrepresented minority of the nation.