Honesty or lies?
Compassion or greed?
Intelligence or narrow-minded?
Guts – or go along to get along?

Ralph Nader
Cynthia McKinney

Ron Paul
Mike Gravel
Dennis Kucinich

Jesse Ventura
H. Ross Perot
President Carter
JFK RFK MLK Malcolm

You say “Some don’t want to vote for Baldwin because he’s too Christian” but that’s not the problem at all. The problem is that the Constitution Party only wishes to follow the Constitution up to the point that it starts conflicting with their theocratic goals. After that the Constitution gets thoroughly ignored in order to merge politics and Christianity at the federal level, which is something that would be thoroughly unconstitutional.

What’s wrong with Barr is that he does not intend to honor his oath office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. He may be sincere when he talks about small government and civil liberties — that these are good ideas, but he does not recognize the Constitution as his authority in office.

According to its preamble, the Constitution was designed in large part to “Secure the Blessings of Liberty.” Liberty is only secure when our governing representatives bear true faith and allegiance to the law of the land and the citizens hold them accountable to that duty. If the Constitution does not grant the president or Congress the power to give billions of dollars in foreign aid, then they aren’t supposed to do it — no matter how they might be able to justify it pragmatically. They weren’t given that power by “law”.

More than a century of ignoring the Constitution is what has caused our immense problems as a nation. When we followed it, America became the most prosperous nation in the history of the world! When we elect a president, we don’t tell them to do their best and fix our country’s problems using their own judgment and wisdom. We tell them to perform their duties in accordance with the “law” (the Constitution).

Some don’t want to vote for Baldwin because he’s too Christian — isn’t that voting based on personality? We are to consider FIRST who will honor their oath and follow the Constitution. All those other considerations come AFTER the principle has been satisfied. Otherwise, we are putting an executive officer in place and telling him that it’s okay if he doesn’t want to follow the law sometimes. Just because Baldwin is a Christian does not mean he will violate his oath of office to try to force it onto others. These are the sins of the the apostate religious right. It means that he will take his oath of office before God and his countrymen seriously because honesty is teaching of Jesus AND he believes in the principles embodied in that founding document.

Baldwin is pledging to follow the law all of the time — believing in those principles of liberty laid out by our Founding Fathers. But Barr only plans to follow it mostly. Barr may be a decent fellow with good intentions, but if he plans to violate his oath because he does not bear true faith and allegiance to the the Constitution — only a set of libertarian or small government ideals, then he would contribute to the growth of government and recession of liberty — just maybe in a smaller way or at a slower pace.

We’ve got to get past the celebrity and vote based on unchanging principle. Ron Paul united everyone in this movement because he believed in those principles AND followed his oath of office 100% of the time without fail. True Constitutionalists didn’t “fall in love” with the man, but rather his principles. America was unique because we made the “law” our ruler — not a person. Hence the term “Rule of Law.” That is what we must embrace if we are to reclaim Liberty.

Bob Barr can suck it. He just lost my vote, what a scumbag.

I’m glad he just ruined his campaign, now maybe the rest can get some extra votes. I honestly don’t know who to vote for now!!!

Cedric

Got history cred?