Supreme Court decisions “ambiguous?”
Ronald Rotunda, a constitutional treatise author and professor of law at George Mason University speaking at the Heritage Foundation says footnotes are “like going down stairs to answer the door during love.” Rotunda believes the Supreme Court has made it more difficult to interpret their opinions through “ambiguous” language and footnotes. (0:20)
July 8, 2008
Categories
Latest Audio
Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter
- @jackrice: U.S. Capitol, 2009 [pic] http://ff.im/-b7yEP -- 4 hours ago
- @jackrice: U.S. House Passes Abortion Amendment to Health Insurance Reform. http://ff.im/-b7uae -- 5 hours ago
- @jackrice: House Erupts in Applause with 218 Votes. http://ff.im/-b7uad -- 5 hours ago
- @jackrice: Will Health Insurance Reform Happen? http://ff.im/-b7uaf -- 5 hours ago
- @jackrice: House Passes Health Insurance Bill. http://ff.im/-b7uac -- 5 hours ago
- @jackrice: House Passes Health Insurance Bill. http://bit.ly/1r7S1d -- 6 hours ago
- @jackrice: House Erupts in Applause with 218 Votes. http://bit.ly/MoW0j -- 6 hours ago
- @jackrice: Will Health Insurance Reform Happen? http://bit.ly/3IZrk9 -- 6 hours ago
- @jackrice: House of Reps is voting on history. For once, voting for health insurance reform is vote for the people. This is about patriotism. -- 7 hours ago
- @jackrice: I'm listening to the soundtrack of Kill Bill, Vol.1. Damn, this thing is great. -- 12 hours ago