Supreme Court decisions “ambiguous?”

Posted by Staff on July 8, 2008 |

Ronald Rotunda, a constitutional treatise author and professor of law at George Mason University speaking at the Heritage Foundation says footnotes are “like going down stairs to answer the door during love.” Rotunda believes the Supreme Court has made it more difficult to interpret their opinions through “ambiguous” language and footnotes. (0:20)

 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast [0:20m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

July 8, 2008

Comments are closed.


Latest Audio

  • Labor Secretary Recalls Helping Undocumented Students Go To College
  • GOP Leaders Look To Suade Moderate Democrats On Health Care Vote
  • Democrats’ Health Bill One Great Big Ponzi Scheme, Says Thune
  • Senate Democrats Employ ‘Gimmickry’ To Keep Health Bill Below $900 Billion

Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter