Myths about torture revealed

Posted by Staff on June 25, 2008 |

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) hosted a discussion on ‘Torture, Justice and Democracy: Myths and Misconceptions.’ Alice Verghese, a Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellow and program coordinator for Asia and the Pacific at the International Rehabilitation Council for Victims of Torture, was invited to share her findings on torture particularly in Sri Lanka and the Philippines.

Verghese defined the paradigms of torture as pain and suffering, physical or mental, which is intentionally inflicted by public officials for purposes such as coercion or obtaining information. She attributed the difficulties in obtaining reliable reports on torture to the lack of consistent data collection methods, fragmented responses from those in the field and the secretive nature of torture itself.

Victor Madrigal-Borloz, a human rights specialist at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, said that international justice systems are not international criminal bodies and that strengthening democracy at the local level was vital. Madrigal-Boloz also said that making the public aware of torture was ‘an element of healing’ to victims of torture. Dr. Allen Keller, associate professor of medicine at New York University, pointed out that the psychological impact of torture should not be underestimated and that it had much longer lasting effects compared to physical torture.

June 25, 2008

Comments are closed.


Latest Audio

  • Rep. Becerra Asks: What Do Polyester Suits And Pre-Existing Conditions Have In Common?
  • Hoyer: We Had The Votes
  • Pelosi Credits Obama For Health Care Success
  • Clyburn: Health Care Reform Legislation Is The Civil Rights Act Of The 21st Century

Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter