The Talk Radio News Service

The Talk Radio News Service is the only information news service dedicated to serving the talk radio community. TRNS maintains a Washington office that includes White House, Capitol Hill and Pentagon staffed bureaus, and a New York office with a United Nations staffed bureau.

← US Commission on International Religious Freedom give recommendations to Secretary Rice U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom discusses North Korea →

Motorcycle Safety at the Pentagon

May 2nd, 2008 by S. Dawn Jones · 1 Comment

It’s not IF you’ll go down, it’s WHEN.

It’s an old adage—one talking about motorcycle riders and crashing—and it’s true. Every motorcyclist has had an accident, whether it be merely dropping the bike (literally dropping it on the ground), or laying it down (also known as “totally crashing” it), and if they haven’t had an accident, they will. The simple fact is motorcycles are dangerous.

The Pentagon hosted a Motorcycle Safety Event in their North Parking Lot, complete with safety vendors, demonstrators, and the obligatory free doughnuts. The Pentagon Police, led by Sgt. Michael Ramsey, demonstrated tight riding, and police from the Pentagon Police Force and Arlington Police Force wowed the crowd by conducting extraordinarily tight 360* rotations and side by side riding— quite a feat when you take into account that the police were riding Harley-Davidson Electra Glides and they weigh over a half ton.

Present were representatives from many safety foundations, notably Total Control and the Motorcycle Safety Foundation (MSF). The MSF offers courses nationwide for both novice riders and experienced riders. Total Control is an advanced riding clinic designed for the rider who already “knows how to ride” but wants to learn how to ride more safely.

Two vendors were exceptional standouts. Simulator Systems International was present with their motorcycle simulator, and even experienced riders were trying it out. Taking full advantage of the latest technology, the simulator used lifelike video-screens, as the “motorcycle” vibrated and moved side to side while “riding.” At the same time, it didn’t respond like an actual motorcycle, and therefore was a bit difficult to ride. Gamers did not mind though—the simulator still proved to be fun in a life-like video game sort of way.

The other standout vendor was Impact Jackets. When a motorcyclist is in an accident, they are thrown from their bikes either onto the ground or a into a vehicle with no protection other than their clothing and, hopefully, a DOT helmet. It is possible to be killed or seriously injured even at a low rate of speed from a motorcycle accident. Airbags, which are lifesavers in vehicles, are not usable on motorcycles. The Impact Jacket provides instead a motorcycle airbag jacket. If the rider is ejected from the bike at a high rate of speed, a cable deploys the airbags and inflates the jacket, complete with a neck support pillow.

Digg This [?]

Tags: News/Commentary

1 response so far ↓

  • 1 Matt // May 2, 2008 at 4:01 pm

    Did you get any video of the Impact Jacket in action?

Leave a Comment

Note: clicking "Submit" signals acceptance of the comment policy printed below.

Comment Policy: We'd like the posts to be civil, of course (no profanity, personal insults, and the like), but we're also hoping that people try to be as calm, reasoned, and substantive as possible. So please, also avoid rants, invective, substantial and repeated exaggeration, and radical departures from the topic of the thread. Sticking with substance -- and staying on-topic -- will make the comments more helpful to other readers, and more pleasant.

As editors, we reserve the right to delete posts, and even to kick out posters, though we hope that both of these will be exceptional events. (We also reserve the right to be busy with other things, and therefore (1) not remove all the posts that might merit removal, and (2) ignore demands such as "You should remove A's posts, because they're just as bad as B's!")

Here's a tip: Reread your post, and think of what people would think if you said this over dinner. If you think people would view you as a crank, a blowhard, or as someone who vastly overdoes it on the hyperbole, rewrite your post before hitting enter.

And if you think this is the other people's fault -- you're one of the few who sees the world clearly, but fools wrongly view you as a crank, a blowhard, or as someone who overdoes it on the hyperbole -- then you should still rewrite your post before hitting enter. After all, if you're one of the few who sees the world clearly, then surely it's especially important that you frame your arguments in a way that is persuasive and as unalienating as possible, even to fools.

Our goal is to provide an interesting and pleasant environment that can help inform readers. To do that, we'll occasionally have to exercise our editorial discretion. Think of this as an in-person discussion group, where having different voices is critical to a great conversation -- but where sometimes the leader has to deal with cranks who sour the conversation more than they enliven it.

Naturally, there's always a risk that this discretion will be used erroneously, no matter how well-intentioned the editor. But discussion groups (especially on the Internet, but also off it) generally need an editor who'll occasionally make such judgments.

And, remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.