Light rail systems create as much pollution as SUVs
Randal O’Toole of the Cato Institute says that rail transit is not a good way of relieving greenhouse gas emissions, and that most light rail lines in the U.S. use as much energy or more as the average SUV and as much carbon monoxide as the average automobile. (0:23)
May 27, 2008
3 Responses to “Light rail systems create as much pollution as SUVs”
Categories
Latest Audio
Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter
- @jackrice: My only question now. Who is more truly unstable? Michele Bachmann or Sarah Palin? A true WTF moment in national politics. God I luv this. -- 7 hours ago
- @bobney: Enjoying fireworks with family tonight -- 11 hours ago
- @jackrice: I have a bad feeling that what Sarah Palin has done to Alaska, she still intends to do to America. Can she spell delusions of grandeur? -- 13 hours ago
- @victoriajones1: Palin quotes General MacArthur "We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction." Would that be towards Washington? -- 14 hours ago
- @victoriajones1: Palin - going to "build up and fight for our state" - out of office. -- 14 hours ago
- @victoriajones1: Palin - only dead fish go with the flow. Not quite true. -- 14 hours ago
- @victoriajones1: VP Biden quite optimistic re resolving boundary disputes between Iraqi govt and Kurds. Biden in Iraq. -- 23 hours ago
- @victoriajones1: Tour de France begins. Lance Armstrong and Alberto Contador on team Astana - should be exciting. No, really. -- 23 hours ago
- @jackrice: Had a great time as always on The Ed Schultz Show on MSNBC. Goes too quickly. The nature of TV. -- July 02, 2009 19:23:17
- @tdowlats: Latest: RUTV Youth Correspondent Nicolas Landa Tami reports: Increased violence on the Amazonian people: http://www.reportersuncensored.com -- July 02, 2009 19:12:44
May 27th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
Huh? What kind of comparison is that? How many passengers can an SUV carry, compared to a light rail line? An SUV can carry what, 4 people (and usually only carries one) - while a light rail line is a mass transit with hundreds or more. Randal O’Toole is comparing apples to oranges, and it sounds as if he is being purposefully manipulative with his “facts” (though not doing a very good job of it since even a child could figure out the difference between a train and a car in terms of carrying potential).
May 28th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
This is a good example of the innuendo that is beign propagated by those who want to keep the light rail revolution from happening. The assertion that is made by Mr. Randal O’Toole is not only misleading but downright false. The per person consuption of energy in a light rail vehicle is far less than that of ANY internal combustion engined vehicle (that includes Hybrids!). Also , Mr O’Toole failed to say that while there is only ONE source of fuel for an SUV (or any other car). There are MANY environmentally friendly sources of the electric energy that is required by Light Rail. The thing is…. There are some interested parties that want to stop light rail from replacing buses or highways in several cities priority lists.Mr. O’Toole should pick his check from GM and find some other special interest group to lobby for.
June 1st, 2008 at 6:43 pm
I feel that Randal O’Toole has a bias against rail which flies in the face of most cities’ experiences with light rail in the past ten years. Portland, Los Angeles, Salt Lake, are among the cities where light rail has succeeded and is well-liked by the public. I’ve read many of Mr. O’Toole’s writings and to me they seem rather “out there” and detached from reality. Just my opinion.