What exactly is “illegal” when it comes to online gambling?
The House Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy, Trade, and Technology held a hearing entitled, “Proposed UIGEA Regulations: Burden without Benefit?” focused on debating the legislation prohibiting illegal online gambling.
The Committee was divided over their views concerning online gambling laws. Many members of Congress said that prohibiting online gambling was necessary because of the effects gambling abuse has on both individual and family life. Supporters of the movement to revoke the online gambling laws argued that the restrictions are an intrusion upon American privacy rights. These members of Congress mentioned how enforcing the law has become a burden for banks being unfairly pushed to enforce gambling legislation upon people depositing checks “illegally” obtained from gaming websites.
A significant portion of the debate was devoted to clarifying how exactly to identify different types of gambling as being either legal or illegal. Being that poker in particularly is both a game of skill and chance, the lines to define such law are difficult to draw.
Categories
Related
- Ellen Ratner speaks to CEO of Bet on Sport, David Carruthers, about his proposal to regulate online gaming.
- Roseman: Online gambling laws are hard to define
- 2.5 Million More Immigrants Will Benefit From Health Care Reform Bill, Say House Republicans
- Democratically-Led Localities Opening Their Eyes To Harmful Effects Of Illegal Immigration
- Ellen Ratner asks CEO of Bet on Sports, David Carruthers, to explain his call for a new advisory counsel on regulating online gambling.
Latest Audio
- Despite Slower Job Loss, Millions Still Unemployed Says New York Democrat
- Boehner Opposes Democrats’ Healthcare Bill Despite Cost Benefits Says Hoyer
- Texas Republican Says Positive Reports About The Stumulus Are False
- Majority Leader Steny Hoyer Hopeful House Will Pass Health Care Bill Saturday Night
Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter
- @jackrice: House of Reps is voting on history. For once, voting for health insurance reform is vote for the people. This is about patriotism. -- 33 minutes ago
- @jackrice: I'm listening to the soundtrack of Kill Bill, Vol.1. Damn, this thing is great. -- 5 hours ago
- @jackrice: Real Men Do Cry! Great Photo! http://bit.ly/1Ib8s9 -- 8 hours ago
- @jackrice: I'm Appearing on MSNBC This Week! http://bit.ly/3FD2U9 -- 8 hours ago
- @jackrice: House Vote on Healthcare Reform Tonight! http://bit.ly/3W9vER -- 8 hours ago
- @jtamboli: Dingell points out that as soon as the Dems finish with their "motions," the Republicans will have a chance.. -- 11 hours ago
- @bobney: I BELIEVE THAT 218 VOTES WEAKENS THE HOUSE IN THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE, JUST A BIT TOO CLOSE--POLITICO -POLITICO.com - http://shar.es/akHX9 -- 11 hours ago
- @bobney: CATHOLIC BISHOP'S HELP PELOSI -Bishops' backing may get bill to 218 - Patrick O'Connor - POLITICO.com - http://shar.es/akHX3 -- 11 hours ago
- @bobney: YouTube - Republican Whip Eric Cantor discusses health care on NBC's Today Show - http://shar.es/akH0c -- 11 hours ago
- @bobney: Prayers and Sympathy to the Families of the fallen and wounded at Ft. Hood -- 11 hours ago




