Hearing on Environmental Protection: Toxic Chemical Policies

Posted by Staff on April 29, 2008 |

Today the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works held a hearing on the Environmental Protection Agency’s toxic chemical policies. Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) blamed the Bush Administration for changes in EPA’s policies that allow political interference in the scientific risk assessment process. She argued that allowing political entities to interfere in a process that demands only scientific expertise inhibits the acquisition of the most accurate information needed to develop policies that will protect American citizens and children from harmful toxins and chemicals in air and drinking water.

Another concern was the secrecy involved in EPA policy making. The Government Accountability Office report said that the EPA had failed to deliver timely, accurate reports that could be held accountable. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) presented a flow chart that compared the EPA’s risk assessment process prior to 2004 to its most recent model, which displays many more steps and which he says obscures the transparency of the process.

Contrasts were made between the United States’ Toxic Substances Control Act, which makes the government responsible for proving chemical safety, and its European counterpart, REACH, that puts the burden of proving chemical safety on the chemical industry itself, which Chairman Boxer said in her written statement is “where it should be.”

April 29, 2008

One Response to “Hearing on Environmental Protection: Toxic Chemical Policies”

  1. Biased Says:

    Is this a Democrat press release or an actual news story? Shame on you.


Latest Audio

  • U.S. Must Build Concrete Border Fence, Says King
  • Immigrants Who Cross Border Illegally Are Criminals, Says King
  • King Says Napolitano Is Obama’s Puppet On Immigration
  • King Says DHS “Going Backwards” On Immigration Enforcement

Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter

  • @victoriajones1: Foo Fighters, Michelle Branch at tonight's BBQ at White House for military personnel & families. Best concert in town. Beats Neil Diamond. -- 38 minutes ago
  • @victoriajones1: Palin spokeswoman: "It's a liberating feeling...she can't get out of there fast enough". Thought job was greatest honor she could imagine? -- 41 minutes ago
  • @victoriajones1: "A man is not finished when he is defeated. He is finished when he quits." Nixon -- 5 hours ago
  • @victoriajones1: Team Sarah statement: "she has provided women with a new political role model". "always true to her...call to public service". Explain. -- 6 hours ago
  • @victoriajones1: Federer. Roddick. Venus. Serena. Sorry Andy Murray. Strawberries. Cream. Miss it. -- 7 hours ago
  • @victoriajones1: Read the Palin speech (http://bit.ly/jM2ZP). -- 7 hours ago
  • @victoriajones1: The greatest honor she could imagine. Serving the Alaskan people, that is. So why quit? She doesn't like being investigated? Surely not. -- 7 hours ago
  • @jackrice: My only question now. Who is more truly unstable? Michele Bachmann or Sarah Palin? A true WTF moment in national politics. God I luv this. -- 16 hours ago
  • @bobney: Enjoying fireworks with family tonight -- 20 hours ago
  • @jackrice: I have a bad feeling that what Sarah Palin has done to Alaska, she still intends to do to America. Can she spell delusions of grandeur? -- 21 hours ago