Conference Call compares House and Senate housing relief tax packages
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities held a conference call today to compare the House and Senate housing relief tax packages. Call participants voiced their concerns about the lack of success both chambers of Congress have had to date in helping families decimated by the crisis concerning housing foreclosures and subprime mortgage rates.
Call participants discussed how the packages Congress has implemented to address the growing rate of housing foreclosures facing Americans “don’t meet the needs” of families seeking government aid. The discussion also focused on the importance of providing struggling families with tax credit, something the Senate bill does not address. Policy analyst Aviva Aron-Dine discussed how there are too many provisions that the relief package bills include (particularly the Senate version) that do not have anything to do with the housing crisis. Call participants explained that tax cuts the bills include for the wealthy are of no assistance to the poor who do not benefit from them.
Aron-Dine described the Senate bill as “extremely disappointing” and noted that while the House version is better, it still does not go far enough toward helping families in dire need of governmental aid. Aron-Dine explained that 60% of the Senate bill has nothing to do with helping solve the foreclosure problem. Call hosts also interestingly noted that forclosures destroy community life as well as family life, and that people renting homes have been affected by the crisis as well.
One Response to “Conference Call compares House and Senate housing relief tax packages”
Categories
Related
- The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities holds conference call to compare the House and Senate housing relief tax packages
- Hoyer: Conference Committee will be a “consensus seeking process”
- Leader McConnell: “Energy is clearly, unambiguously the number one issue in the U.S.”
- Conference Call Dissects McCain’s Substance Free Housing Speech
- Pelosi: Robust Public Option Is Not Dead
Latest Audio
Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter
- @travisAmartinez: Sen. Specter and Leahy bones it out before the vote. Lieberman and Burris high five after the vote.. -- 7 hours ago
- @jackrice: So 60 votes in the Senate. Now come the real fight. -- 7 hours ago
- @bobney: Sen. George Voinovich: Why waste time on a badly flawed health-care bill? | OPEN: Ohio Politics - cleveland.com - - ... http://shar.es/aiCnd -- 7 hours ago
- @jtamboli: Voinovich didn't vote because he's in Cleveland celebrating the beginning of his political career. http://bit.ly/85eHNR .. -- 7 hours ago
- @travisAmartinez: With 60 votes Senate agrees to begin debate on health care reform bill.. -- 7 hours ago
- @bobney: Buckeye Blitz !!!!!!!! Another year down -- 12 hours ago
- @jackrice: I Embed with the the 82nd Airborne in Afghanistan in Dec. http://ff.im/-bOlF2 -- 14 hours ago
- @bobney: Wow, money for votes, doesn't that get you in trouble? :-) - POLITICO.com - http://shar.es/aiGGE -- 14 hours ago
- @bobney: Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) will vote for cloture to begin the healthcare debate, has reserved her right to vote no on passage -- 14 hours ago
- @tdowlats: RT @huffingtonpost Reporters Uncensored: How to Build a Continent: A Do it Yourself Guide http://bit.ly/48dl6X -- 16 hours ago





April 11th, 2008 at 1:20 pm
What good will any bailout of deadbeat homeownres do if you do not help out the housing market too? This bill tries to stabilize the housing markets ad help deadbeats at the same time. If you only help the deadbeats, but homes sales/prices keep adjusting downwards these deadbeats will begin to complain again…jmho.