The Talk Radio News Service

The Talk Radio News Service is the only information news service dedicated to serving the talk radio community. TRNS maintains a Washington office that includes White House, Capitol Hill and Pentagon staffed bureaus, and a New York office with a United Nations staffed bureau.

← Photos from Sudan Clinton Campaign Conference Call on State of Presidential Race →

Happy Anniversary? For Many in Iraq, Bush Thinks Five Years of “Operation” Means Just That

March 19th, 2008 by Staff · No Comments

Today’s five year anniversary of the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom provided President Bush with an opportunity to reflect upon the successes his administration has had in restoring democracy, securing America, and championing terror in the Middle East.

The President spoke before a room packed with high ranking military officials with a speech focused on thanking the armed forces, defending the tough decisions he has made as Commander-in-Chief since the terrorist attacks of September 11th, and his insistence that the battle that currently rages on in Iraq is one we “must win.”

Citing the fact that Iraqi’s now hold free elections, Bush noted that Iraqi citizens are able to enjoy freedoms they could only dream of under the brutal Sadaam Hussein, a dictator Bush noted, “We got.”

Bush acknowledged that winning in Iraq has been longer and more expensive than his administration initially assumed. Should we leave now Bush maintained, we would risk “emboldening” yet-to-be-found terrorists, obsessed with harming the American people. Bush also noted the success the “surge” US forces working to combat terror has had. Today, said the President, more than 90,000 Iraqi’s fight for their country alongside the United States.

Bush explained that criticisms about the cost of the war have been “exaggerated.” “Men and women,” Bush said, “who love liberty, can defeat the terrorists.” Hopefully, when the 10 year anniversary of Operation Iraqi Freedom is reached, American’s can reflect upon a war finally over, not one still raging on.

Digg This [?]

Tags: News/Commentary

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Leave a Comment

Note: clicking "Submit" signals acceptance of the comment policy printed below.

Comment Policy: We'd like the posts to be civil, of course (no profanity, personal insults, and the like), but we're also hoping that people try to be as calm, reasoned, and substantive as possible. So please, also avoid rants, invective, substantial and repeated exaggeration, and radical departures from the topic of the thread. Sticking with substance -- and staying on-topic -- will make the comments more helpful to other readers, and more pleasant.

As editors, we reserve the right to delete posts, and even to kick out posters, though we hope that both of these will be exceptional events. (We also reserve the right to be busy with other things, and therefore (1) not remove all the posts that might merit removal, and (2) ignore demands such as "You should remove A's posts, because they're just as bad as B's!")

Here's a tip: Reread your post, and think of what people would think if you said this over dinner. If you think people would view you as a crank, a blowhard, or as someone who vastly overdoes it on the hyperbole, rewrite your post before hitting enter.

And if you think this is the other people's fault -- you're one of the few who sees the world clearly, but fools wrongly view you as a crank, a blowhard, or as someone who overdoes it on the hyperbole -- then you should still rewrite your post before hitting enter. After all, if you're one of the few who sees the world clearly, then surely it's especially important that you frame your arguments in a way that is persuasive and as unalienating as possible, even to fools.

Our goal is to provide an interesting and pleasant environment that can help inform readers. To do that, we'll occasionally have to exercise our editorial discretion. Think of this as an in-person discussion group, where having different voices is critical to a great conversation -- but where sometimes the leader has to deal with cranks who sour the conversation more than they enliven it.

Naturally, there's always a risk that this discretion will be used erroneously, no matter how well-intentioned the editor. But discussion groups (especially on the Internet, but also off it) generally need an editor who'll occasionally make such judgments.

And, remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.