White House Gaggle

Posted by Staff on May 1, 2007 |

By Dana Perino
10:18 A.M. EDT

MS. PERINO: Good morning. We’re on our way to MacDill Air Force Base.
This morning the President had his normal briefings. At 11:40 a.m.
he’ll have his briefing at CENTCOM. It is stills at the top. I think

the schedule says closed, but it will be stills at the top.

Let me tell you — the main people that the President will be meeting
with for the briefing are Admiral William Fallon — he’s the Commander
of U.S. Central Command — General Doug Brown, Commander U.S. Special
Operations Command, and General David Petraeus, Commander Multinational
Force Iraq.

And then the President will make remarks to the CENTCOM coalition
conference; expecting around 160 people in the audience. These are
senior national representatives from the various countries. The
President will speak to their annual conference, and he will thank our
many partners in the global war on terror coalition and highlight the
broad range of successes the coalition has had while fighting
terrorists. One number you might want is, since 2003, 143,336
cumulative coalition troops have served in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Q Served in all of these — in Iraq and Afghanistan?

MS. PERINO: Cumulative coalition troops, right.

Q From how many countries?

MS. PERINO: I know it’s around 30 nations now, but I think at one time
it was up to –

Q Just in Iraq?

MS. PERINO: I think it’s Iraq and — I think it’s total, Iraq and
Afghanistan. I’ll get — Bill Luti is on the flight from NSC, and he
gave me that number, so I’ll see if I can get those two numbers for you.
And then –

Q That number doesn’t jibe — there’s more than 150,000 U.S. troops
at some point –

MS. PERINO: These are coalition — this doesn’t include American
forces.

Q Not including.

MS. PERINO: Correct.

Q Non-American –

MS. PERINO: These are non-U.S. And then the President will meet with
some families of the fallen. I’ll try to get you more specifics, at
least in terms of the number of families and where the soldiers died
when we get there. And then we are back at the White House at 5:45 p.m.

Q Will he mention the supplemental and the veto in his remarks?

MS. PERINO: No, no.

Q What do you all know about Masri’s death?

MS. PERINO: Only what we talked about before we left, which is, MNFI
has not confirmed, and so I will defer to them, if and until they have
something more to say.

Q Any update on the timing of the veto?

MS. PERINO: As of departure, we still do not know the time that we were
going to get the bill, and so we are not able to announce any plans yet,
but as soon as we do, I’ll let you know. If that does come while we’re
in the air or on the ground, I’ll come and find you and let you know.

Q Is there any possibility that he would veto it today when he got
back?

MS. PERINO: That’s within the realm of possibility, sure.

Q But it would be when he’s back, he obviously –

MS. PERINO: Correct. We didn’t have it to bring with us in a special
case.

Q And he does expect to receive –

MS. PERINO: All indications we’re going to receive it today, but I
don’t know what time. And so it will just depend — and so as soon as I
know that, I’ll let you know. They said that — we might not know until
the early afternoon. And so we’ll find out.

Q Would he prefer to do it today? Or would it be — does he think it
might be weird to veto it on the same day that he’s meeting with the
leaders, tomorrow?

MS. PERINO: No, I don’t think the President would think that would be
weird. I think that the President would have preferred to sign this –
have a bill that he could sign that was going to fund the troops. He
would prefer not to have to veto the bill. And as you all know, it’s
been 80-odd days since he sent up his request. And so he would prefer
to get the — a clean bill done.

He knew that — well, he told the Congress weeks ago that he would veto
a bill if it came to him in the form that it’s coming. He’s going to
make good on that — on his word. And then I believe that the leaders
and the President will get together quickly. As you know, the President
invited them to come to the White House tomorrow. And I don’t have a
time on that yet. I’ll see if I can get that. And then they’ll get to
work on crafting a bill that they can sign that — I’m not going to
negotiate from here. But as the President said yesterday, he’s looking
forward to the discussions. I think the leaders have said the same.

Q Do you guys consider benchmarks — any kind of consequences for
benchmarks on the table?

MS. PERINO: I can say, I’m just going to decline to comment on any type
of negotiating position from here. I’m going to let the leaders meet.
And then if we get more from there, we can let you know.

Q Is there any, shall we say, reluctance on the President’s part to
actually go through the veto today, being that it’s the fourth
anniversary of the "mission accomplished" banner, his speech –

MS. PERINO: Obviously, that is — even thought the Democrats won’t say
so on the record, it is a trumped-up political stunt that is the height
of cynicism and it’s very disturbing to think that they possibly held up
this money for the troops and the troops’ families and the resources
they need to try some PR stunt on this day.

The President realizes that today is the fourth anniversary of the day
he gave a speech on the USS Abraham Lincoln. As I said last Thursday in
the briefing, that speech has been widely misconstrued, and I encourage
people to go back and read it. The President did say we had a long and
difficult road ahead of us. We’re moving from a dictatorship to
democracy.

But in addition to that, the President has since said that we did not
anticipate the amount of sectarian violence that would happen in the
year of 2006, especially fomented by al Qaeda with the Samarra mosque
bombing in February of 2006. The President said where there have been
mistakes, those mistakes — that responsibility for those mistakes rests
with him.

And so today is the President’s opportunity to go and thank the
commanders for all of their work, to highlight their successes, to talk
about the new strategy that the President has underway, being
implemented by General David Petraeus. And he is proud of the work that
they’ve done, the terrorist plots that they have thwarted. And he also
is going to remind them about the consequences of success and the
consequences of failure.

Q Does the President — does the President regret the "mission
accomplished" speech?

MS. PERINO: Look, I’ve never heard him describe it that way, absolutely
not. Let me just remind everybody, in case you need it, that speech
there, I encourage people to read it. The President never said "mission
accomplished." I realize that the banner said "mission accomplished."
That was specific to the mission of that ship. They were supposed to be
deployed for six months. They were deployed well beyond that. I think
they’d gone to both Iraq and Afghanistan. And that’s what that banner
was referring to. But I’m not going to –

Q He did said, "In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our
allies have prevailed."

MS. PERINO: We did prevail, in terms of toppling the Iraqi army and
Saddam Hussein. And several months later, 12 million Iraqis voted for a
new government and a constitution. And things looked very promising.
And the President did believe that at the end of 2006, he would be
announcing basically what was in the Baker-Hamilton report.

Unfortunately, the sectarian violence had grown to the extent that the
President, in the fall of 2006, underwent an extensive review to decide
on a new strategy in Iraq, of which he announced on January 10, 2007.
And the President believes that helping the Iraqi people now is
critical. He disagrees with the idea of a time — a date to tell the
enemy exactly when we’re going to leave, because it would leave a vacuum
that would only lead to many more deaths of the innocent men, women and
children of Iraq, destabilize the region. And that is surely not in the
long-term interests of the national security of our country.

Q Can I ask about — do you have a good read of what’s going on in
Turkey right now? Is the White House concerned at all that democratic
principles may not be adhered to when they’re trying to sort out their
– the presidency?

MS. PERINO: I would have to get back to you on that. I’m not well
versed in it. I do know that Sean McCormack spoke at length in his
briefing yesterday. I don’t know if there’s anything new.

Q Okay.

MS. PERINO: Okay?

MR. DECKARD: The meeting is at 2:25 p.m. tomorrow.

MS. PERINO: That’s good. Josh Deckard. Hat trick. Two-twenty-five
p.m. tomorrow is the meeting with the congressional leadership. And it
will be bipartisan, bicameral, the larger group, as they — that’s the
same group that came two weeks ago.

Q Do you know coverage yet?

MS. PERINO: I don’t. That might be part of — what I can tell you
about later today.

Q Thanks.

MS. PERINO: Okay. All right, see you on the ground.

END 10:27 A.M. EDT

May 1, 2007

Comments are closed.


Latest Audio

  • Labor Secretary Recalls Helping Undocumented Students Go To College
  • GOP Leaders Look To Suade Moderate Democrats On Health Care Vote
  • Democrats’ Health Bill One Great Big Ponzi Scheme, Says Thune
  • Senate Democrats Employ ‘Gimmickry’ To Keep Health Bill Below $900 Billion

Happening Now - TRNS on Twitter